
It’s only subtle. Insidious may be a better word. But I’m finding it increasingly difficult to string more than a few sentences together these days. I have not failed in a writing competition for quite a while, however, having opted for the financially prudent tactic of not entering one.
I have scratched out a few lines that occasionally pretend to rhyme in response to others. But they are definitely getting worse, having already started from a low base.
But here’s some of them anyway, just for the record.
****
A nautical fellow named Frank
Took to sea in an old water tank
In there he hid
‘Till he opened the lid
And it filled full of water and sank.
*
There’s a spider crawling on the wall
I hear you calling will it fall
Upon the bed? Such dread
Spreads through your head
That with eight legs might thus be wed
I hear you thinking after all
That you might hold me close instead
Now on the floor a herd of ants
A military style advance
A target deep within your pants
And plans to make you squeal and dance
Should I upon them promptly prance?
Or give the beasts a fighting chance?
On the ceiling paint is peeling
Dirt concealing mould
There’s bugs there’s gnats
On filthy mats
The rats are getting bold
Before you kneeling. Still appealing
My love. You’re feeling old
No wheeling, dealing. No time worth stealing
Please give me healing from the cold
*
Poetry, as we all knows
Is for them, that don’t do prose
A platform for artistic rage
A mess of words thrown at the page
To let the reader rearrange
What might at first seem deeply strange
With meanings hidden from first view
The reader gives them life anew
It’s like my drawer of underwear
You’ll never find a matching pair
Of socks in there, if you should look
It’s just a poem, it’s not a book
But you’ll see better what I say
If you politely look away
And find a more reflective view
Giving credit where no credit’s due
*
Let us speak of magic
Of mysteries within
Of searching through the labyrinth
To end where we begin
Trapped within the chamber
Where we hide our every sin
Where we find what we have lost
Where we lose all that we win
I hear you in the distance
A gentle violin
Your spirit calls, I walk through walls
To reach beneath your skin
*
Grab a bottle, pop the cork
Kindly use a knife and fork
I allow you within my dominion
But I don’t want to hear your opinion
So take a seat, but please don’t talk
*
We sit then we crawl then we walk
Use our hands then a spoon then a fork
Things are progressing
Our parents obsessing
But regretting the first day that we talk
*
There is no proper time or place
Get that flag out of my face
Those precious lives all disappeared
To hide the truth you’ve always feared
To satisfy your petty need
Gorging on your filthy greed
*
Freedom.
a mirage
that grows real
with every second look
Until you walk towards it
And realise that you have imagined
Everything that you thought to be true
And that reality itself is just a mirage
From which you lack the freedom to look away
*****
Are you still reading? No? I thought not. I’ll shut up for another few months.
I love these!! If this is mental decline, I hope it continues!! 😮
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, it’s continuing. Don’t worry about that. And don’t get me started on the physical decline…..
LikeLike
Love to see you and read these poems, such variety I enjoyed. I think the last one is relatable to me as a US citizen. Thanks for the entertainment
LikeLike
And, as always, thank you
LikeLike
(((((((Bravo Mr Richmond!!!))))))))) Corky, theatrical, metaphoric ~ Poetry!!!
Below are a few of my favorite lines 🙃
“Poetry, as we all knows
Is for them, that don’t do prose
A platform for artistic rage
A mess of words thrown at the page
To let the reader rearrange
What might at first seem deeply strange
With meanings hidden from first view
The reader gives them life anew
It’s like my drawer of underwear
You’ll never find a matching pair
Of socks in there, if you should look
It’s just a poem, it’s not a book-“
LikeLike
Hey! Don’t shut up. The world needs more!
LikeLike
That is so wonderful of you to say, Chel.
I have learned a lot from the realisation that, despite our diametrically opposed epistemological perspectives we find ourselves philosophically aligned in many ways.
All that said, I don’t really think the world needs more of me, or if it ever needed me in the first place. I think it might need more of you, though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Spoken like a true curmudgeony man.
The reason we’re so aligned is because I think like you. I just kept going, instead sticking around in atheism.
That still doesn’t mean I’m not curmudgeony as well…
LikeLike
You kept going? Maybe we passed in the traffic, headed in opposite directions. There’s very few reliable road signs in life, and no roadmap.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nope; same jaded road. Same distrustful skepticism. There are definitely signs and they’re amazing. Many claim there is a roadmap as well, but I’m sure it’s more like an intended denouement of a writer and many sequels are forthcoming.
LikeLike
A roadmap …. I suppose, after all, that 3 wise men almost literally witnessed the birth of Christianity using astral navigation that would have done Vasko De Garma proud, and to a level of precision, in fact, superior to any modern day sextant.
As for the sequels …. particularly the televised ones so popular in certain areas of your own country, you’d have to admit that they fall well short of the original in terms of poetic appeal.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha ha… yeah; mainstream Christianity is very very odd. I’m nothing like that.
LikeLike
Chel …. ALL religion is very odd. That is, more or less, the essence of it. One cannot discuss knowing the unknowable without things starting to sound a bit odd.
But I’m all for oddness. I may see the whole thing as a fiction, but much of it is a beautiful fiction. The thing that spoils religion is humanity. If it weren’t for humanity and humanity’s desperate need to ‘explain’ everything, religion would be fine. It would be great to live in the time of Thor and Apollo and Vulcan and Eros, don’t you think? Back in the days when the Christian and Islamic and Hindu Gods didn’t exist, because it was a time before we felt the need to invent them.
There has been a bit push to make religion less odd – a bit more marketable to the masses, but this has never really worked, I don’t think. As soon as you start trying to remove the mystery you begin to realise that there’s nothing much left – the magic has vanished.
I’m more in favour of old Catholic Church services where everything is in Latin and people wear strange pageantry costume and the air is full of incense. It’s dark and mysterious and beyond tangibility.
The moment I started seeing acoustic guitars appearing in churches I knew that we’d lost our way.
If God is all that we don’t understand then trying to explain ‘Him’ is to misunderstand that very nature of religion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Once again, you and I are the same in thought. There are no electric guitars at our church meetings and no mainstream watering-downs (although, yes, they’re not in Latin).
I’m able to see from many perspectives and have come to the understanding I currently have as a very fulfilling and complete one.
I will say that you and I diverge a bit in the final paragraph, where you wish for God to remain mystical (magical) and without explanation. I know there are rules and order to which everything must abide; for me, personally, I seek logic and rules over no explanation at all.
LikeLike
I mean it in as far as God, if I am to apply the term at all, IS mystery. A God explained is not a God. I can’t speak for the specifics of your church, but for most belief systems logic needs to be the first casualty, and I’d point out that God himself seems to insist on it – requiring instead, faith. What separates Gods from humans is that humans are bound by logic. Gods have no such limitations.
LikeLike
I knew what you meant. The mystery of God is as much a mystery as the genre: all we need is Holmes gathering us into a lounge to explain the big whodunnit, using clues that were in plain sight the entire time.
So: no, abandoning logic to insist on accepting its absence is ridiculous.
LikeLike
Hmmmm ….. there are lots of clues, we are really only debating what conclusions to draw from them. Frankly, I don’t think even Holmes would be able to come up with any sort of proof, one way or the other.
But who doesn’t like a good mystery? Isn’t there always a tinge of sadness when Holmes reveals all and the show is over, don’t you think? Some mysteries are best left unsolved. Magic is only magic as long as the magician remains hidden beneath his cloak.
LikeLike
You sure are determined to stay locked up in your room, aren’t you? I keep pointing out the places where there are light, the places where you’ve misunderstood the chains, the shadows, and the echoes -not even as an invitation to leave, but from a point of your misunderstanding my own experiences. And yet, there you sit: repeating what you’ve said despite my trying to clarify. I promise: I’m not chasing a mystery. I don’t believe there are forever-unknowns. I most certainly do not claim, “Hallelujah!” and, “Praise Jesus” during televangelist sermons; I may converse more like Matthew Broderick in “Ladyhawke.”
The entire point is that there is more. It’s much better than the point I’ve been before, and *that* point is the one you’re squatting at. So; I really don’t mind your squatting or your frankly discussing points; I *do* seek less repetition when I’ve already explained how I don’t think a certain way that you claim I do.
LikeLike
Well, OK. Fair enough. I can be a little repetitious. Sorry.
I confess that I didn’t catch ‘Ladyhawke’, so I certainly remain in the dark there, but I DO actually see light, and the direction I look when finding it may be very similar to the one in which you look. The difference for me is that I don’t put a name to it. I try to understand it, but do so with the acceptance that I never will have a full understanding, and I’m comfortable with that.
I think I was fairly confident, though, that you weren’t the ‘praise Jesus of the television’ type – but am glad to have it confirmed!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for clarifying on all those points. I’m happy to hear we are at a similar place and can stop quibbling over the ultimate pointlessness (or, to an optimist, the ultimate point) of existence. 😀
LikeLike
I suspect, Chel, that you and I live our lives similarly. It doesn’t seem to make much difference if there is or isn’t a God.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It used to be that way for me. Since returning, I’ve found a greater meaning -even a deeply satisfying entropy- in knowing Him.
LikeLike